JPS
|
|
Top If you like our site, please bookmark it so it will be easy to find later.
SUPERMARKET FACTS - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 2004 MARKETERS TARGET CONSUMERS THRU RETAILERS' FREQUENT-SHOPPER PROGRAM DETERMINING HOW TO PROMOTE YOUR BRAND USING LOYALTY PROGRAM DATA ONLY 15 PERCENT OF CUSTOMERS ARE LOYAL BUT REPRESENT 55 PERCENT OF SALES SLOTTING ALLOWANCES IN THE SUPERMARKET INDUSTRY FMI REPORTS ON CONSUMER ATTITUDES AND THE SUPERMARKET FMI DISCUSSES BUILDING SHOPPER LOYALTY WITH STORE BRANDS COMPETITION AMONG TRADITIONAL AND NEW CHANNELS IS INCREASING
PRIVATE
LABEL DIFFERENTIATES RETAILERS CROSS-CHANNEL
SHOPPING IS WIDESPREAD IN TODAY’S MARKETPLACE WAL-MART
ALTERS WAY GROCERY BUSINESS IS RUN FREQUENT SHOPPER DATA IS UNDERUTILIZED ASSET IN THE CPG INDUSTRY LOYALTY
CARDS COMBINED WITH CHANNEL AND CONSUMER INSIGHTS BUILD LOYALTY & PROFITABLE
GROWTH SUPERMARKET NEWS TOP 75 US GROCERY STORES (SALES) SUPERMARKET NEWS GLOBAL TOP 25 SUPERMARKET FACTS - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 2002 DATA MINING LOYALTY PROGRAMS IS ESSENTIAL FOR ROI TRADE DIMENSIONS REPORTS 2002 CHANNEL CHANGE STATISTICS LATEST U.S. CONVENIENCE STORE COUNT AT 132,424 STORES 2001 SUPERMARKET SALES INCREASE 3.5 PERCENT TO $398.2 BILLION WHOLESALE GROCERY COMPANIES MARKET SHARE SHELF
PRESENCE SHOWS INCREASE IN PRIVATE LABEL THE TOP 50 SUPERMARKET COMPANIES FOR THE YEAR 2001 MANUFACTURERS PARTNER WITH RETAILERS TO EVALUATE FSP DATA EXECUTION BELIEVED TO BE CRITICAL BARRIER TO TRADE PROMOTION SUCCESS HOW
TO DEVELOP A SMART CARD BASED LOYALTY PROGRAM FREQUENT SHOPPER/LOYALTY PROGRAMS SHOULD BE PLANNED CAREFULLY SUPERCENTERS INCREASE MARKET SHARE COUPONS KEEP BRAND LOYAL CUSTOMERS PRIVATE-LABEL GROWTH EXCEEDS NATIONAL BRANDS DATA MINING FREQUENT SHOPPER DATA A.C.
NIELSEN RELEASES FOURTH ANNUAL FREQUENT SHOPPER STUDY ON-LINE RETAILERS AND SUCCESSFUL PROMOTIONS DATA MINING FREQUENT SHOPPER PROGRAMS FREQUENT SHOPPER & LOYALTY PROGRAMS THE IMPORTANCE OF
CUSTOMER LOYALTY
REBATE & PREMIUM FULFILLMENT ARTICLES
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|
11. |
|
|
12. |
|
|
13. |
|
|
14. |
|
|
15. |
|
|
16. |
|
|
17. |
|
|
18. |
|
|
19. |
|
|
20. |
|
|
21. |
|
|
22. |
|
|
23. |
|
|
24. |
|
|
25. |
![]()
SUPERMARKET FACTS - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 2004
|
Number of employees- 2002 |
3.4 million |
|
Total supermarket sales-2004 |
$457.4 billion |
|
Number of supermarkets--2004 ($2 million or more in annual sales) |
34,252 |
|
Net profit after taxes, 2003/2004 |
0.88% |
|
Median Average Store Size in Square Feet |
45,561 |
|
Weekly sales per supermarket 2003 |
$348,130 |
|
Percentage of disposable income spent on food--USDA figure for 2003 |
|
|
Weekly sales per square foot of selling area-2004 |
$8.68 |
|
Sales per customer transaction-2004 |
$24.64 |
|
Sales per labor hour-2004 |
$79.77 |
|
Average # of trips per week consumers make to the supermarket-2004 |
2.2 |
|
2004 |
2004 |
|
|
$ Sales Billions |
% of Total |
|
|
Supermarkets ($2,000,000 + ) |
457.4 |
100.0 |
|
Chain Supermarkets |
386.4 |
84.5 |
|
Independent Supermarkets |
71.1 |
15.5 |
|
Grocery (Under $2,000,000 |
17.5 |
N/A |
|
Wholesale ClubStores* |
32.6 |
N/A |
|
Convenience** |
114.0 |
N/A |
|
Convenience/Gas Kiosk** |
13.2 |
N/A |
|
2004 |
2004 |
|
|
Number |
% of Total |
|
|
Supermarkets ($2,000,000 + ) |
34,252 |
100.0 |
|
Chain Supermarkets |
22,453 |
65.6 |
|
Independent Supermarkets |
11,799 |
34.4 |
|
Grocery (under $2,000,000) |
13,182 |
N/A |
|
Wholesale Club Stores* |
1,034 |
N/A |
|
Convenience** |
138,205 |
N/A |
|
Convenience/Gas Kiosk** |
25,205 |
N/A |
|
2004 |
45,561 |
|
2003 |
44,000 |
|
2002 |
44,000 |
|
2001 |
44,000 |
|
2000 |
44,600 |
|
1999 |
44,843 |
|
1998 |
40,483 |
|
1997 |
39,260 |
|
1996 |
38,600 |
|
1995 |
37,200 |
|
1994 |
35,100 |
Source: Food Marketing Industry Speaks 1995 - 2005
|
2003 |
$348,130 |
|
2002 |
$361,564 |
|
2001 |
$368,779 |
|
2000 |
$335,242 |
|
1999 |
$334,479 |
|
1998 |
$333,411 |
|
1997 |
$284,700 |
|
1996 |
$212,382 |
|
1995 |
$209,875 |
|
1994 |
$193,035 |
|
1993 |
$192,760 |
Source: Food Marketing Institute Industry Speaks 1993 - 2004
|
Total |
$ 92.50 |
|
Size of
Household |
|
|
Two |
$ 83.90 |
|
Three-Four |
$110.50 |
|
Five or More |
$136.40 |
|
Type of Household Children |
$118.30 |
|
No Children |
$82.30 |
Source: Food Marketing Institute, Trends in the United States: Consumer Attitudes and the Supermarket, 2005
|
Store Definitions |
Grocery Store
— Any retail store selling a line of dry grocery, canned goods or nonfood
items plus some perishable items.
Supermarket—Any full-line self-service
grocery store generating a sales volume of $2 million or more annually
Convenience Store— Any full-line,
self-service grocery store offering limited line of high-convenience items. Open
long hours and provides easy access. The majority sell gasoline with an annual
sales of $2 million or more.
Independent — An operator of fewer than 11
retail stores.
Chain — An operator of 11 or more retail
stores.
Conventional
Supermarket - The original supermarket format offering a full line of
groceries, meat, and produce with at least $2 million in annual sales.
Conventional stores will realize 9% of their sales in GM/HBC. These stores
typically carry approximately 15,000 items, offer a service deli and frequently
a service bakery.
Superstore - A larger version of the
conventional supermarket with at least 40,000 square feet in total selling area
and 25,000 items. Superstores offer an expanded selection of non-foods (at least
10% GM/HBC).
Food/Drug Combo - A combination of
superstore and drug store under a single roof, with common checkouts. GM/HBC
represents at least one-third of the selling area and approximately 15% of store
sales. These stores also have a pharmacy.
Warehouse Store - A low-margin grocery store
offering reduced variety, lower service levels, minimal decor, and a streamlined
merchandising presentation, along with aggressive pricing. Generally, warehouse
stores don't offer specialty departments, e.g., Xtra.
Super Warehouse - A high-volume, hybrid
format of a superstore and a warehouse store. Super warehouse stores typically
offer a full range of service departments, quality perishables, and reduced
prices, e.g., Cub Foods.
Limited-Assortment Store - A
"bare-bones," low-priced grocery store that provides very limited
services and carries fewer than 2,000 items with limited-if any-perishables,
e.g., Aldi and Sav-A-Lot.
Other - The small corner grocery store that
carries a limited selection of staples and other convenience goods. These stores
generate approximately $1 million in business annually.
Convenience Store (Traditional) - A small,
higher-margin store that offers an edited selection of staple groceries,
non-foods, and other convenience food items, i.e., ready-to-heat and
ready-to-eat foods. The traditional format includes those stores that started
out as strictly convenience stores but might also sell gasoline.
Convenience Store (Petroleum-Based) - The
petroleum-based stores are primarily gas stations with a convenience store.
Non-Traditional
Grocery
Hypermarket - A very large food
and general merchandise store with approximately 180,000 square feet of selling
space. While these stores typically devote as much as 75% of the selling area to
general merchandise, the food-to-general merchandise sales ratio is typically
60/40, e.g., Bigg's.
Wholesale Club - A membership
retail/wholesale hybrid with a varied selection and limited variety of products
presented in a warehouse-type environment. These 120,000 square-foot stores have
60% to 70% GM/HBC and a grocery line dedicated to large sizes and bulk sales.
Memberships include both business accounts and consumer groups, e.g., Sam's
Club, Costco, and BJ's.
Mini-Club - A scaled-down version of the
wholesale club. The mini-club is approximately one-fourth the size of a typical
wholesale club and carries about 60% of the SKUs, including all of the major
food and sundry departments and a limited line of merchandise (soft goods,
office supplies, and opportunistic, one-time buys), e.g., Smart & Final.
Some of these stores do not have membership fees and often operate as a
"cash & carry."
Supercenters - A large food/drug combination
store and mass merchandiser under a single roof. The supercenters offer a wide
variety of food, as well as non-food merchandise. These stores average more than
170,000 square feet and typically devote as much as 40% of the space to grocery
items, e.g., Wal-Mart, Kmart, Super Target, Meijer, and Fred Meyer.
Deep-Discount Drug Store - A low-margin, GM/HBC
store with approximately 28,000 square feet of selling space and 25,000 SKUs.
These stores typically carry fewer sizes but more GM/HBC brands than a
supermarket. Food accounts for 20% of store sales, e.g., Phar-Mor and Drug
Emporium.
Internet - An Internet-based grocery
distribution operator. Included in this format are all Internet operators who
use the Internet as the primary means of accepting grocery orders for home
delivery or pickup. Also included are major food retailers that generate a
portion of their sales through Internet-based sales. Internet suppliers
typically offer 12,000 SKUs or more for home delivery, e.g. Peapod.
![]()
MARKETERS TARGET CONSUMERS THRU RETAILERS' FREQUENT-SHOPPER PROGRAM
Consumer Product Goods marketers are targeting consumer through retailers’ frequent-shopper programs to efficiently reach consumers at account-specific levels that can be effectively calculated.
Grocery chain retailers are under pressure from new formats and alternative retail channels (Wal-Mart) to maintain their market share. Their frequent-shopper programs provide consumer loyalty and valuable targeted marketing data that is their primary weapon against their competitors.
Marketers look for programs and retailers that will allow them to communicate to their target consumers directly rather than using more traditional 'mass' vehicles by providing a targeted offer based on the consumer's purchasing habits. Manufacturers have been proactive in card-based frequent-shopper programs including Coca-Cola, Kraft, Procter & Gamble, Pillsbury and Unilever. Retailers have data about individual consumers that manufacturers cannot gather on their own, including buying patterns, total basket purchases, predisposition to switch brands, and sensitivity to promotions.
Manufacturers typically fund basic co-branded promotions, including coupons, the cost of advertising, and in-store signage and may get involved with designing the program and assisting in the analysis of the data. Retailers are very protective of their customer data and many are very cautious in sharing that information with manufacturers for analysis and third-party analytic firms play an important role for theses trading partners. Retailers do not provide the identities of their consumers and the manufacturers analyze general purchase data, without identifying the individual consumers identity. Retailers and manufacturers should look for common goals and synergies from a customer perspective and focus on improving data analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of their marketing promotions.
![]()
DETERMINING HOW TO PROMOTE YOUR BRAND USING LOYALTY PROGRAM DATA
Retailers and manufacturers tend to look at the lift they get during promotions or they may get a little more complex and look at the incremental lift from the promotion. You can determine consumer lift by analyzing your loyalty programs customer card data to understand how many consumers purchased the product when it was promoted, whether or not they’re new consumers to the brand, new consumers to the category, and to look at their switching patterns to understand what they purchased before and if the promotion was truly incremental. If all the retailer did was switch people who were already purchasing in the category, then the retailer really didn’t gain any new consumers. You need to look at what happened after the promotion to the consumers who responded to the promotion. Did they stay with the brand, did they stay with the category, did they just switch to that brand during the promotion, or did they change and purchase that brand and become loyal to that brand long term?
That’s important to understand so you can really begin to understand the effect promotion has on consumers and what it has to do with loyalty. As a manufacturer, if you rewarded people who would have bought the product anyway and didn’t bring any new users to your brand, then you’ve really just sacrificed margin.
The retailer needs to keep two years of data to really understand the effects of promotions on consumers in the future. You need a pre-period that is detailed enough to understand what consumers were doing before, and you need a post-period of some substance. Unfortunately, many retailers don’t keep data online for that long. So even if they wanted to do this analysis themselves, they do not have enough data online to be able to do it.A good way to use promotion is to encourage people to come into that category even if the first purchase is on a discount. That’s what you want to do with targeted discounts because you leverage promotions to bring new consumers to your category, however, you want to bring new consumers into your category who will stay with it and also purchase your product at full revenue.
Return-On-Investment (ROI) is a lot more than just gross margin. It’s understanding and building a loyal base of consumers who will shop your brand and your category and will shop it when it’s at full revenue as well as when it’s on discount. That’s where "margin blending" comes in because if you margin-blend a category, you look at all the brands and all the packages within the category to try and identify the brands that are not price sensitive, the brands that people will purchase anyway at full price. If they’re going to purchase it anyway, then there’s no point in discounting, because then all you’re doing is reducing profit out of the category.![]()
Retailers use their Frequent-Shopper Loyalty program sales data to tailor their product assortment to their most loyal shoppers. Only 12 percent to 15 percent of customers are loyal to a single retailer, according to the Center for Retail Management at Northwestern University, but they represent between 55 percent and 70 percent of sales. Nearly two-thirds of shopper (65 %) believe Frequent-Shopper Pogroms are important. More than 50 percent of retailers now offer Frequent-Shopper Programs and nearly two-thirds of program customers use their loyalty cards at least weekly and 84 percent at least once a month, according to the FMI, Trends in the United States: Consumer Attitudes & the Supermarket 2003. Supercenters, warehouse-clubs, dollar stores and limited-assortment stores choose to offer everyday low prices.
A Frequent-Shopper or Loyalty-Marketing program is an electronic method of identifying customer purchases and translating that information on their shopping habits and preferences. They identify the retailers’ most loyal customers, their buying habits and can offer the products and services that their best customers demand. The retailer can analyze their shopping habits, refine marketing programs and fine-tune the product mix at the chain or individual store level. They can identify the promotions that appeal most to various customer groups and tell you when products were sold and whether they were sold on or off promotion, and the profit margin on each sale. Overall, shopper give food retailers high marks for their frequent-shopper programs as 41 percent rate them excellent and another 45 percent rate them as good.
A study by McKinsey & Company estimated that a Frequent-Shopper program’s first year can cost as much as $30 million, with annual maintenance and marketing costs reaching $5 million to $10 million. Smaller retailers may be able to purchase of-the-shelf CRM (customer relationship management) software.
Retailers typically analyze data at the aggregate level, i.e. data from groups, not individuals. The key to the success of these programs is to interpret data from your loyalty program more quickly, cheaply and frequently. Faced with intense price competition from Wal-Mart, food retailers must ensure that their programs offer both value and other customer benefits.
Retail loyalty cards have advanced as an aggressive marketing tool, with 82% of consumers participating in some form of loyalty program, according to a survey conducted by WSL Strategic Retail, New York City. Supermarkets are the leader by a wide margin with 58% of consumers carrying a supermarket card and 82% trying to use the card every time they shop. About 17% will go out of their way to use the card.
According to a Card-Based Marketing Report from Retail Systems Consulting and TDLinx, there are 12,849 supermarkets in the U.S. with card-based frequent shopper programs, representing 38% of supermarkets and 42% of the total ACV (estimated all commodity volume). CPG manufacturers are interested in frequent shopper programs due to targeting and measurability. Retailers have the ability to reach specific consumers based on past purchases, where manufacturers are limited mainly to customer self-reporting surveys that are often less than accurate. Retailers can also accurately measure consumer activity after a promotion. Retailers will not provide the names and addresses of their customers to manufacturers. Manufacturers need this information so they can evaluate whether or not they can move brand dollars from traditional vehicles, such as FSIs, into retailer frequent shopper programs.

Coverage is particularly strong in certain regions, for example, New England (48% of store count, 57% of ACV covered), Mid-Atlantic (42% of store count, 60% of ACV), and the Southwest (42% of store count and 48% of ACV). The other regions are Southeast (42% of stores, 38% of ACV), East Central (34% of stores, 38% of ACV), East Central (34% of stores, 43% of ACV), West Central (29% of stores, 39% of ACV), and Pacific (35% of stores, 37% of ACV.) I estimate that an average of twenty percent of independents have frequent shopper programs. Clearly the numbers prove 1) FS programs are growing, and 2) they have gained critical mass across the US.
The growth is significant, especially when viewed over the last eight years. In 1996 there were just over 4,000 U.S. stores with programs. By 1999 there were 9,000 stores, or 29.6% of U.S. supermarkets, accounting for approximately 25% of the ACV. In 2002, 30% of the stores (just over 10,000) had programs, with 44% of ACV covered. The increase in the last few years came mainly from big chains rolling out their programs to all their stores, including Kroger, Albertson’s, and Winn-Dixie. There need to be more cooperation between the manufacturers and retailers, and greater internal communication at retailers’ headquarters between marketing and category management.
![]()
1.
What are slotting allowances?
Suppliers
pay distributors slotting allowances for product placement on store shelves.
Sometimes distributors request them, and sometimes suppliers offer them.
Although common, these allowances are neither uniformly requested nor offered.
The
most common allowances are for new products or new product introduction
allowances. These may also cover premium product placements, such as on
eye-level shelves or special displays; the cost to have products remain on
shelves or pay-to-stay allowances; or the cost to retailers if a product fails.
2.
How much are slotting allowances?
The
amount varies depending on numerous factors, such as whether the supplier has a
proven track record, whether consumer testing has been performed, whether the
product is carried by competitors in the same market, and whether the supplier
has a well-conceived advertising program. The amount can be as small as several
hundred dollars to have a new product introduced in a single store to many
thousands of dollars for a chain-wide promotion. In some instances,
manufacturers provide free cases of new products to help retailers gauge
consumer demand. Since each new product introduction is unique, these allowances
are typically negotiated individually and no industry-wide numbers are
available.
3.
Why are slotting allowances used?
The
principal reason is to cover the considerable costs to introduce a product, to
remove the item that previously occupied the shelf space and to recover some of
the investment in the likely event that the new product fails. Depending on how
a new product is defined, the failure rate ranges up to 80 percent per year.
Each
year, food retailers spend an average of $956,800 per store on new products that
fail, according to a study of 1995 introductions by the market research firm
Linton, Matysiak & Wilkes. The major reason cited for failures is a lack of
market research. In many cases, manufacturers are using retailers to test-market
new products. Through slotting allowances, manufacturers are, in effect, having
the retailer conduct a live market trial instead of paying for test market
research.
4.
Why are new product introductions so costly?
About
100,000 grocery products are available on the market. The typical supermarket has space for only 30,000 to 40,000
products, and the failure rate for new products is as high as 80 percent. With
so many items competing for so little shelf space, new product introductions
have become a high-cost, high-risk proposition. As many as 24 steps are needed
to introduce a new item and another 10 to remove the one that occupied the
space, according to a Deloitte & Touche study (Managing the Process of Introducing and Deleting Products in the Grocery
and Drug Industry, 1990). Based on this study and current retail practices,
these steps include:
|
Evaluation by buyers or category managers. | |
|
Reprogramming computers for inventory management, category management, store deliveries, labor scheduling, shelf labels and scanners. | |
|
Providing space in the warehouse and back room and on the shelf. In many cases, the entire shelf must be reset (both physically and in computer plan-o-grams) to make room for the new product. | |
|
Verifying that the item has been set according to the plan-o-gram and that checkout registers scan it correctly. | |
|
Developing merchandising programs. | |
|
Changing accounting records, including bill-payment procedures for the new item. | |
|
Monitoring product performance. | |
|
Modifying advertising programs as needed. | |
|
Deleting existing items to create the necessary shelf space. | |
|
Many of these same activities are required for the product being removed, except in these cases the item must be deleted from all computer and financial records, merchandising efforts must be refocused and unsold products must be disposed of — often at a fraction of the original value. |
5.
Are slotting allowances offered for all products?
No.
They are not offered for most established products or for new offerings that
have a high likelihood of success.
Arguments for Slotting Allowances include:
|
| |
|
Allocate the costs and risks associated with product introductions more equitably between trading partners. | |
|
Help retailers allocate shelf space more effectively. | |
|
Offer shelf space opportunities for valuable new products. | |
|
Facilitate lower retail prices. |
Argument
against Slotting Allowances include:
|
Enable retailers to exercise market power. | |
|
Undermine trading partner relationships. | |
|
Provide a mechanism for price discrimination. | |
|
Foreclose competitive opportunities for certain manufacturers and retailers. | |
|
Facilitate higher retail prices. |
The
true impact may depend on how the practice is applied. The Federal Trade
Commission (FTC) takes the view that these issues need to be considered on a
case-by-case basis as it reviews complaints.
8.
Are slotting allowances legal?
According
to Oct. 20, 1999, testimony by Willard K. Tom, deputy director of the FTC’s
Bureau of Competition, before the House Judiciary Committee, the legality of
slotting practices “can be determined only in light of all the surrounding
facts and circumstances.” Even in cases where a small supplier cannot afford a
high slotting fee, the practice can be deemed legal, he said, as long as the
market remains competitive and consumers “receive the benefits of low prices
and wide product selection.”
![]()
A
study was presented at the 2003 FMI Conference called “Trends in the United States:
Consumer Attitudes & the Supermarket, 2003” which revealed that
alternative shopping channels continue to take value-driven consumers away from
traditional grocery stores.
Resulting
from the increased competition from supercenters and discount stores, only 79
percent of shoppers said a traditional supermarket was the primary grocery
store, down from 81 percent in 2002, while 18 percent chose a discount store or
a supercenter, up from 15 percent in 2002. There is a growing shopper base for
supercenters, dollar stores and warehouse clubs.
Low
prices gained in importance as 83 percent saying it was very important compared
to 77 percent in 2001. Shoppers who
choose discount stores and supercenters instead of traditional supermarkets as
their primary store generally have lower household incomes ($41,800 versus
$49,500 for traditional grocery stores), are younger (median age 41.2 versus
44.8) and have larger households (3.3 percent versus 2.8 percent).
Discount and supercenter store shoppers are more price driven (92%) than
traditional supermarket shoppers (82%).
Traditional
shoppers rate higher than discount stores and 67 percent of primary traditional
supermarket shoppers would recommend their stores compared to 60 percent of
primary discount shoppers. Consumers
believe the economy will not recover soon and were concerned with unemployment,
problems with business ethics, terrorism, war with Iraq and rising fuel costs.
This resulted in consumer confidence dropping in February 2003 to the
lowest level in more than nine years. The
five most frequently practiced cost-savings measures have remained constant:
·
Look for grocery specials in the newspaper (36%).
·
Participate in frequent-Shopper Programs (30%).
·
Stock up on sale items (27%).
·
Use cents-off coupons (21%).
·
Price comparisons (21%).
While
the percentage of shoppers reporting their primary store offers Internet grocery
shopping increased from 9 percent in 2000 to 16 percent in 2002, it dropped to
14 percent in 2003 with only 3 percent of the shoppers purchasing groceries
online in the last 12 months. Sixty-nine percent said that they have Internet
access versus 62 percent in 2000.
In
2003, the average household weekly grocery bill ranges from $52 for one person
to $138 for large households of five or more people. On average, grocery
shoppers eat their evening meal away from home 1.4 time per week with younger
consumers and smaller households eating away from home more frequently than
older shoppers and larger households.
Gasoline
and self-checkouts have been quickly adopted by shoppers as 60 percent purchase
gasoline and 53 percent use self-checkouts where available. Warehouse clubs,
supercenters, dollar stores and convenience stores continue to expand in
offering gasoline.
The
number of consumers interested in purchasing irradiated products has increased
from only 38 percent in 2000 to 57 percent in 2003 due primarily to the high
level of concern regarding bacteria as a health risk. Almost all shoppers (92 percent) of shoppers are aware of
sell by dates on packaging with 89 percent saying that they frequently look at
this information. Food items most
frequently checked are most perishables, uncooked meats and dairy products.
![]()
As competition
continues to grow to gain market share for the consumers grocery dollar, from
new channel options such as Warehouse Clubs, Supercenters and Dollar Stores,
store brands or private label products have become more important as they
provide a unique difference from their competitors.
They also have the ability to provide store loyalty, increase
profitability and improve customer satisfaction.
An
FMI study called “Building Shopper
Loyalty with Store Brands” indicated that store brand shoppers are as
demanding about high quality products, good selection, convenient location,
product availability and customer service and not simply lower prices.
There appears to be a shift in demographics from lower-income households
to more affluent households, especially among premium store brands.
Ethnic shoppers (African Americans, Hispanics and Asians) are less
inclined to purchase private label products, however this may change with target
marketing strategies.
There
is a direct correlation between store brand loyalty and store loyalty as
shoppers who believe that their stores private label is important are likely to
be loyal to that retailer. Premium
private label can attract new users to private label, especially from more
affluent shoppers who are less price-sensitive but require high quality and
value.
Category
management is the key to success as factors that influence product selection
varies widely across categories. When
price is not the most important factor, retailers must manage store brand
pricing to ensure that the pricing supports the overall categories as well as
the store brand strategies. Marketing
and merchandising strategies must be developed to increase market share
including improved packaging, in-store sampling and communicating the high
quality of the brand.
Store
brands represent an estimated 17 percent of the $729 billion dollar grocery
industry and the growth of store brands have averaged almost double that of
national brands. Store brand market
share can increase as evidenced in England where private label has reached 45
percent at Tesco Plc and 60 percent at J Sainsbury Plc.
With
increased competition across several channels for the consumer’s grocery
dollar, store brands represent value and approximately 70 percent of shoppers
place high importance on store brands when selecting a grocery store. The
increased number of channels has eroded market share for several grocery
categories in traditional supermarkets, especially with nonfood items.
Heavy
private label shoppers purchase more than 30 percent store brand items when
shopping. They study reported that
36 percent of shoppers buy 10 percent or fewer private label items while 36
percent buy between 11 percent and 30 percent of store brand items and 28
percent buy more than 30 percent store brand items. Heavy private label users are not as motivated by low prices
as the price-oriented shopper, however pricing plays a role in communicating
quality driving brand and retail image and enhancing margins.
One-third of heavy private label shoppers trust the store brand to of
high quality and as good as national brands.
Price and value drive them while light private label purchasers focus on
brand loyalty and family preferences. Seventy-three
percent think that store brands are produced by the same manufacturer as
national brands with a different label.
Shoppers
that are loyal to a retailer are more likely to purchase store brands and the
reverse is true. While private label has traditionally been marketed as a
lower-cost alternative to a national brand, retailers are now promoting quality
and freshness. Simply carrying more store brands does not guarantee success as
the study showed that stores that managed their categories better to maximize
store brand performance were more successful.
Store brands play a critical role in driving overall retail and category
strategy and should not be based solely on margins. Price and quality were the leading factors for food items and
while packaging was not as important, it reinforces the consumers’ attitudes
about quality. Package design must clearly project a brand image and identity,
attract attention at the shelf, promote value and quality and reinforce the
brand message with the consumer at the point-of-purchase.
Traditionally,
heavy private label users in terms of dollars tend to be larger, less affluent
families, however premium private label items have attracted higher income
professionals with smaller families. Price conscious private label consumers are
generally women, age 35 to 54, with larger families and a median household
income of $39,200.
Managing
the store brands through tiered strategies, especially premium brand
development, positively impacts the growth of store brand sales.
Premium private label shoppers have more positive attitudes toward store
brand quality and trying new products. The
packaging should signify an upscale, high-quality product. Understanding the
consumer is key to developing strategies to increase private label sales.
Brand segmentation and targeted marketing can bring new consumers to
purchase private label products.
While
ethnic shoppers tend to be more brand loyal, a targeted store brand program can
succeed and an opportunity exists to market directly to ethnic groups.
There are opportunities for private label growth with ethnic shoppers as
their combined buying power in the U.S. has reached $1trillion.
By 2030, 19 percent of the U.S. population will be Hispanic, 13 percent
African American and 7 percent Asian American/Indian.
Language translation, in-store sampling, packaging and in-store marketing
should be part of the retailers marketing strategy for ethnic shoppers.
Developing
store brands with high quality and unique product attributes can build store
loyalty and shopper satisfaction. Retailers
should be clear and consistent with the brand message, product quality and
value. Effectively marketing store brands requires a combination of preferential
merchandising, displays, advertising and promotions.
It is important for retailers to optimize store brand awareness at the
point-of-purchase. Utilize existing loyalty card data to develop a relationship
between the retailers’ customers and store brands and target the customers
with a combination of trial-generating promotions and brand messages.
Retail
loyalty cards and programs have moved to the forefront as an aggressive
marketing tool, with 82% of consumers participating in some form of loyalty
program, according to a survey conducted by WSL Strategic Retail, New York City.
Supermarkets lead the pack by a wide margin with 58% of consumers carrying a
supermarket card and 82% trying to use the card every time they shop. About 17%
will go out of their way to use the card.
Customer participation in loyalty reward programs for other market including:
Credit cards (29%), drug stores (27%), entertainment stores (24%), travel
programs (23%), bookstores (20%), restaurants (19%) and greeting card stores
(16%).
Return to the top of the page
![]()
COMPETITION
AMONG TRADITIONAL AND NEW CHANNELS IS INCREASING
Competition among food retailers has never been more dynamic with more than a dozen types of retailers competing for market share. Food retailers today include conventional supermarkets, superstores, supercenters, membership clubs, combination (food and drug) stores, natural and organic outlets, limited assortment stores, convenience stores, dot-coms and gasoline stations. Consumers have never had more choice in variety, value and quality. The competition includes restaurants, especially fast food, which are near the milestone of controlling half the $850 billion market for food sales. Dual-income couples and generations X and the echo boomers are fueling steady sales growth in “food away from home.”
Families
still eat most of their main meals at home, but a dramatically increasing number
of those meals are fully or partially prepared by outside sources. Driving this
trend is the increase individual-income families (and their overworked couples)
and young adults who don’t like to cook or don’t know how. As a result, they
buy an increasing portion of their food ready-to-eat or -heat. Many food
retailers are expanding and upgrading the frozen meal selection. Their bakeries
are selling breakfasts. Their delis are selling lunches and side dishes for
dinner. Salad, pizza and coffee bars are spreading. For one-stop convenience,
shoppers can go to superstores, supercenters, combos and super warehouse
outlets. For value, they have limited assortment, warehouse and wholesale club
stores.
The
industry is consolidating while competition among traditional and new channels
is increasing dramatically. The various food retailer formats include:
Grocery
Industry Market Share by Format
|
||||
|
|
2001 |
2006 |
||
|
Store |
Number |
Dollar
Share |
Number |
Dollar
Share |
Superstore |
7,900 |
25.9% |
9,200 |
25.9% |
|
Conventional
Supermarket |
13,000 |
18.8% |
12,500 |
15.1% |
|
Food/Drug
Combination |
3,850 |
14.3% |
4,300 |
15.2% |
|
Supercenter |
1,575 |
9.9% |
2,020 |
15.3% |
|
Wholesale
Club |
991 |
8.5% |
1,200 |
8.5% |
|
Convenience |
42,99 |
6.0% |
41,750 |
5.4% |
|
Convenience
with gasoline |
40,800 |
4.6% |
42,500 |
4.2% |
|
Warehouse |
800 |
2.6% |
1,200 |
2.4% |
|
Super
Warehouse |
480 |
3.0% |
405 |
2.7% |
|
Internet |
80 |
0.1% |
200 |
0.4% |
|
Limited
Assortment |
1,871 |
1.6% |
2,500 |
1.4% |
|
Deep
Discounter |
190 |
0.3% |
300 |
0.3% |
|
Mini
Club |
174 |
0.3% |
210 |
0.2% |
|
Hypermarket |
9 |
0.1% |
9 |
0.1% |
|
Other |
33,000 |
4.3% |
30,000 |
2.9% |
|
TOTALS |
147,620 |
|
148,294 |
|
|
Source:
Willard Bishop Consulting, Ltd., Competitive Edge, June 2002 |
||||
Conventional
Supermarket
— carries
about 15,000 items, including a full line of groceries, meat and produce, with
at least $2 million in annual sales.
Superstore
— larger
than a conventional supermarket with at least 25,000 items and more nonfoods,
such as general merchandise and health and beauty care (GM/HBC) items.
Combination
Store
— a
superstore and full-line pharmacy with nonfoods accounting for at least 15
percent of sales.
Warehouse
Store
— a
low-margin outlet whose limited variety, service and décor allow it to charge
low prices.
Super
Warehouse Store
— a
hybrid warehouse/superstore with 50,000-plus items and the full range of service
departments, featuring high-quality perishables and reduced prices.
Limited
Assortment Store
— a
low-price outlet with minimal service and fewer than 2,000 items. It features
numerous private label products and is popular among food stamp recipients
seeking to stretch their limited dollars.
Convenience
Store
— traditional
outlets offer a small selection of dry groceries, beverages, nonfoods and
ready-to-heat and -eat foods. Many are now selling gasoline as well.
Independent
Single Unit Stores
— these
include numerous small, family- owned bodegas and retailers, along with upscale
and ethnic stores that serve specific demographic niches.
Hypermarket
— a
large food and nonfood store with about 180,000 square feet of selling space;
the food to nonfood ratio is typically 60/40 percent.
Supercenter
—
a
large food-drug combination store and mass merchandiser. These average more than
170,000 square feet and typically devote up to 40 percent of the store to
grocery items, which are often sold at loss-leader prices.
Wholesale
Club
— a
retail/wholesale hybrid that offers consumers and small businesses a limited and
economical selection of food and nonfood products. These measure about 120,000
square feet; 60–70 percent of the space is devoted to bulk sizes of both
grocery and GM/HBC products.
Drug
Deep Discounter
— a
low-margin GM/HBC store with about 28,000 feet of selling space and 25,000
items. Food accounts for about 20 percent of store sales.
Internet
Food Retailer
— typically
offers 12,000 items for home delivery triggered by online orders. After the
failures of dot-com pioneers in the 1990s, online retailers are now joining
traditional companies in so-called brick-and-click ventures.
![]()
PRIVATE
LABEL DIFFERENTIATES RETAILERS
As
food-retailing competition intensifies across the nation, private label store
brands have become an increasingly important element of differentiation among
U.S. food retailers and a key driver in total store sales and shopper store
loyalty, according to a new report from the Food Marketing Institute (FMI), Building
Shopper Loyalty With Store Brands.
Private-label
products have become premium, high quality items that compete with national
brands on image, not just because of lower prices. Consumers perceive them to be
good values and encourage loyalty to the store as well as provide a way to
differentiate the store from the competition.
The report, Building Shopper Loyalty With Store Brands, indicates
private-label products account for 15.1 percent of the retailer’s sales and
totals $44.4 billion a year. Private label brands have increased market share in
nine of the past 10 years and now represent approximately 17 percent of the $729
billion grocery industry, according to the report.
They
are as much or more demanding than other shoppers regarding good selection,
high-quality products, convenient location, good customer service and especially
the availability of trusted store brands. Traditionally, the heaviest store
brand shoppers tend to be from larger and less affluent households. The report
finds, however, more affluent shoppers are now purchasing store brands. This is
especially noticeable among premium store brand shoppers.
Ethnic
shoppers, notably Hispanics, African Americans and Asians, are less likely to
purchase private-label products overall, even though they recognize the value of
store brands. Although ethnic shoppers may agree with some of the value
propositions of store brands, they are generally less inclined to purchase
private label products overall and have yet to demonstrate strong store brand
loyalty. This could be due to a lack of familiarity with the brands,
particularly among recent immigrants. The study finds, however, that retailers
can find success with ethnic customers by targeting marketing campaigns to reach
them.
A study by Daymon & Associates indicated that heavy private label users are price-oriented, younger shoppers with lower incomes and larger households. Price and value dictate their shopping behavior, whereas light users focus on brand loyalty and family preference. Even price-conscious shoppers consider quality, family preferences and attractive packaging when making their purchases. One-third of heavy private-label shoppers trust the store brand to be as good in quality as the national brand and are very loyal to the store. Value-tier shoppers tend to be middle-aged, middle-income women with children (the same shoppers, who go to Supercenters, warehouse clubs and discount stores for low prices).
Private
label can continue to grow in the United States as sales average about nine
percent higher in Europe. Store-brand
shoppers value good selection, high quality products, convenient location and
good customer service and above all, product availability. Store-brands perform
differently between food and non-food categories. Retailers should focus on food categories because non-food
items are increasingly purchased at mass merchandisers and club stores.
Retailers should add premium or value tier private label to expand the
market shares by reaching their upscale shoppers and increase sampling of store
brands. One way to reach multiple
consumers’ needs is to carry a tiered private-label program, but make sure the
customer understands your message by communicating not only price but value.
Providing product lines with store brand value tiers can be effective in
promoting value pricing and minimizing shopper visits to alternative format
stores for lower-priced products, according to the report. While value seekers
are often price-oriented, they also place a high importance on selection and
variety.
Traditional
merchandising strategies can be just as effective in promoting store brands as
they are with national brands, according to the report. Tactics such as in-store
sampling, attractive signage, advertising and direct mail can be used to educate
the consumers on the attributes of store brands and to encourage purchases. This
is especially true with premium store brand shoppers as over 75 percent of
shoppers indicated that they would purchase more store brands if they could try
them in the store.
Retailers
should understand that having a great private label and spreading it across
several categories would not deliver the optimal results. Carrying more store
brands does not guarantee success. They need to look at each category
individually and understand what factors drive purchase. Pricing, promotion and
selection are important. Private
label consumer packaged goods (CPG) sales are growing much faster than branded
products, according AC Nielsen’s U.S. Trends in Private Label report. Branded
products still represent the majority of all CPG sales, private label products
have increased sales growth and are increasing in the number of categories,
becoming the share leader in more categories, and gaining an increased presence
in more retail channels.
Since 1997, private label products have grown from having a presence in 69
percent of the categories to 75 percent, entering 88 new categories in that
time. In 2002, private label had the dollar volume share lead in 25 percent of
the categories in which it competed, up from 21 percent in 1997. The vast
majority of private label's overall growth is coming from expanded sales in
established categories. Private label manufacturers are introducing different
package sizes and types, new flavors, and adding new, higher-priced premium
private label products. In addition, several retailers are increasing their
focus on providing in-store samples of their products and using other promotions
to increase sales.
The grocery channel owns the largest share of total private label consumer
packaged goods sales. However, its lead is decreasing as other retail channels
add private label products to their shelves. The dollar store, warehouse club
store and supercenter channels are generating the strongest growth in private
label sales, albeit off of sales bases that are still relatively small.
![]()
CROSS-CHANNEL
SHOPPING IS WIDESPREAD IN TODAY’S MARKETPLACE
Cross-Channel shopping is widespread in
today’s marketplace. Grocery store lead the way with a penetration rate of
100% followed closely by mass merchandisers at 95% and drug stores at 88%.
Discount channels follow at a distant 50% and convenience stores/gas marts have
a 44% penetration rate.

Discounters, however, are capturing an increased share of dollar expenditures. Wal-Mart Supercenters enjoyed a 19.3% growth in shopper expenditures with 59% of this growth stems from consumers crossing channels as follows:
| Grocery | 28% |
| All Other Outlets | 12% |
| AO Mass Merchandisers | 8% |
| Drug Store | 4% |
| AO Super Center | 4% |
| Club | 2% |
| Dollar Stores | 1% |
Half
of Americans have shopped at a Dollar Store in the last year and that is taking
profits away from other channels. Seventy-one percent of the heaviest
Convenience Stores shoppers also shop at Dollar Stores. One-third of Dollar
Store shoppers make 72 percent of the total Dollar Store trips and represent 84
percent of all their sales.
The top 1000 items carried in Dollars by category include household
cleaners, candy, trash bags, snack foods, laundry and dish detergent, soap,
cookies and pet food products.

Grocery
stores are losing sales to Wal-Mart primarily due to cross
over shopping to discounters
and their expansion, which included:
185
Supercenters (110
are expansions or relocations, 85 are new locations);
40 Discount
stores (500 food
centers in discount stores by 2003);
25 SAM’S
Clubs;
20 Neighborhood
Markets (Testing);
2 regional
merchandise centers, 3 food distribution centers and 2 fresh food distribution
centers.
This
shift is prevalent among white-collar versus blue-collar workers. Convenience
stores and gas marts are becoming food to go experts. Success
in product retailing lies in understanding the consumer.

Retailers
and Manufacturers need each other
as the retailer is
merchandising the Manufacturer’s products and the manufacturer is marketing
the brand.

![]()
WAL-MART
ALTERS WAY GROCERY BUSINESS IS RUN
Wal-Mart is altering the way the grocery business is run just as it did in discount retailing over the past decade. Wal-Mart began selling groceries in 1998 and it only took them five years to become the nation’s largest grocer in 2002 with more than $54 billion in grocery sales. Wal-Mart operates from 1,258 supercenters (180,000 square foot grocery and discount store combination), and 49 small Neighborhood Markets (40,000 square feet), most in the South and Southwest. In the last ten years, 29 chains have filed for bankruptcy protection of which as many as 25 Wal-Mart was the catalyst.
Grocery consolidations from 1987 to 1997 caused food prices to increase and raising profits. That allowed Wal-Mart to enter the grocery business and cut prices up to 15 percent while still making a profit. Studies indicate that Wal-Mart charges 8% to 27% less than Kroger, Albertsons or Safeway, the next three largest grocery retailers. Kroger, Albertsons and Safeway has expanded their private label store brands which provide larger margins and develop loyalty to the retailer as the store brands are unique to that retailer. Approximately 24 percent of Kroger’s total grocery sales come from its 7,500 store brand products. All three chains are trying to take advantage of Wal-Marts biggest weaknesses of meat and selection.
Labor costs which total as much as 70 percent of these grocers overhead because they are unionized, where Wal-Mart’s one million employees do not belong to a union, thus reducing their labor costs by about 20 percent.
Supply
chain efficiency in the grocery industry has increased significantly in the last
five years due primarily to Wal-Mart as they influence the economy in the U.S.
According to McKinsey & Company, a large part of the U.S.
productivity growth between 1995 and 1999 can be attributed to Wal-Mart.
The innovations that Wal-Mart has caused their retail competitors to
improve their supply chain efficiency or fail.
Wal-Mart has utilized productivity-enhancing technologies and established
supply management practices that have reduced their supply chain costs
significantly, affecting the entire supply chain industry.
By
automating their facilities, retailers have lowered the costs of store-specific
distribution. Retailers are reducing costs from the supply chain by focusing on
suppliers. Retailers require suppliers to reduce the amount of time and costs to
them and levy penalties or chargebacks for errors in distribution.
This has become a standard in the industry and is very expensive,
reducing margins for suppliers. Another
common practice is that suppliers distribute goods ready to be displayed on
store shelves, reducing labor costs for the retailer such as bar codes, security
devices, special packaging and price tags.
Wal-Mart
is the now the largest supermarket operator in the United States according to TD
Linx rising from fourth last year due to its expanding supercenter and
Neighborhood Market business. Kroger dropped to second with Safeway and
Albertsons at third and fourth place, respectively. The top 10 grocers remain
the same, although A&P dropped behind Supervalu to 10th place and is less
than $100 million in supermarket sales ahead of No. 11 H.E. Butt. Among
wholesalers that operate supermarkets, only Supervalu moved up.
Discount store operator Target has increased its grocery business coming
in at number 27.
Wal-Mart
continues to expand across the United States and has plans to open 200
supercenters, 55 conventional discount stores, 40 to 45 Sam’s Clubs, and up to
25 Neighborhood Markets in 2003. Wal-Mart is now the leading retailer in Canada
and Mexico. In addition, it owns Asda, a leading retailer in the United Kingdom,
and operates stores in South America, Asia, and Europe.
Kroger
held the No. 1 or No. 2 share in 41 of its 48 major markets in 2002, increasing
its share in 27 of them—and it accomplished this while competing against a
total of 849 supercenters, 603 of them Wal-Mart’s.
![]()
FREQUENT
SHOPPER DATA IS UNDERUTILIZED ASSET IN THE CPG INDUSTRY
Frequent
shopper data is the most underutilized asset in the CPG industry today. The
first step is to understand
the value and habits of key shopper groups, which must be standardized. You
should identify problems and opportunities as early as possible and define a
finite set of shopper segments. Frequent
Shopper Program data provides powerful insights to drive category tactics
Next, evaluate the program effectiveness.
The objectives of an effective frequent shopper program include:
|
Targeting | |
|
Focus on your best customers | |
|
Eliminate Waste | |
|
| |
|
Better understand shopping behaviors | |
|
Integrate
insight with everyday decision-making |
You
should utilize the data from your Frequent Shopper Program to answer the
following questions:
|
Who responds to trade promotion? | |||
|
Who
are the new brand or category buyers? | |||
|
Who are the heavy/medium/light buyers? | |||
|
| |||
|
| |||
| |||
|
Do deals increase brand/category purchase frequency?
| |||
|
What
are the long-term effects of trade promotion? | |||
|
Does loading or cycle compression lead to expandable consumption? | |||
|
Does current promotion strategy “train” shopper to buy on deal? | |||
|
|
How
retailers and manufacturers are collaborating to build brand equity by
developing an effective Frequent
Shopper/Loyalty Program.
| Maximize retailer category
profits and sales | |
| Combining consumer insight
and market intelligence | |
| More effective and consistent
retail pricing practices | |
| Retailer and manufacturer
collaboration is necessary |
What
questions do retailers have about a Frequent Shopper/Loyalty Program?
|
Improve sales/margin | |
|
Impact of my pricing strategy? | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
Competitive
response? |
What questions do manufacturers have about a Frequent Shopper/Loyalty Program?
|
Trade
funds used effectively? | |
|
Consistent
brand image? | |
|
Impact of promotions? | |
|
| |
|
Category
dynamics? |
The goal of your Frequent Shopper/Loyalty Program
|
Optimize
SKU level profit and sales | |
|
Optimize Category level profits and sales | |
|
| |
|
Competitive
Better Positioning:
Competitive advantage | |
|
Enhanced Consumer Perception: Consistent pricing | |
|
|
| Stronger
Category Performance: Enhanced
recognition of brands and positioning | |
| More
Efficient Promotions: More
effective use of trade funds | |
| More
Informed Brand Management: Extension
vs. new product introduction | |
| Improved Retail Collaboration Better informed retail partners |
Summary
| Success
begins with the data | |
| Canned
approaches will not work | |
| Processes
must be reviewed | |
| Rules
must be applied consistently | |
| Simple user interface is a must |
Maximizing use of consumer data is vital for retailers battling supercenters and grappling with the difficult economy. Retailers battling supercenters need to focus on what they do best instead of reacting to competitive prices. You should go into an offensive strategy rather than a defensive one.
![]()
LOYALTY
CARDS COMBINED WITH CHANNEL AND CONSUMER INSIGHTS BUILD LOYALTY AND PROFITABLE
GROWTH
Loyalty
cards have been around since 1988 and supermarket and drugstore chains are
starting to collect the massive amount of data on shoppers, from the types of
products they buy to when they like to shop. Retailers are starting to track
consumer trends and they're changing their merchandise, store layout and
advertising accordingly to keep their most loyal customers spending.
Loyalty card programs can measure the impact of ads on top customers and for
example identify the 25 items that attract the most loyal shoppers. Loyalty card
programs are in over 30% of grocery stores (44% ACV) including two major
holdouts Albertson’s and Winn-Dixie.
Grocery retailers are
still not quite sure how to manage the data. In many cases, the internal loyalty
data is skewed because 62% of Loyalty card shoppers have multiple loyalty cards and
many retailers offer a GHOST card for non-card holders. In addition,
retailer’s best shoppers buy 50% of their groceries in other grocery stores or
channels. However,
information from Loyalty cards, combined with channel and consumer insights can
help retailers market in a manner that builds loyalty and profitable growth.
The
supermarket industry benefit the most from loyalty cards because consumers shop
there an average of 2.2 times a week. Helping Retailers compete in a changing competitive environment
promotes long-term partnership and mutual growth. By swiping these cards
at the register, consumers are able to get the weekly discounts advertised on
certain products. In many cases, customers can get a card without giving their
names or addresses, but they won't be mailed coupons for extra discounts,
customized according to their buying habits. For example, shoppers who buy a lot
of baby products may get extra discounts on diapers.
Retailers estimate that 20 percent of their shoppers account for 80 percent of
store sales, so finding out what their best customers want is essential. By
scanning purchases, stores track what's selling, but when that data is tied to
loyalty cards, merchants obtain richer information on who is buying what.
Services that may seem helpful to consumers could be a way to get them to spend
more. The latest N.G.A. survey of
250 independent retailers showed that only 30% said they were engaged in
frequent-shopper programs, down about 8% from last years survey.
![]()
Total U.S. sales in grocery stores are $682.3 billion, according to U.S. Department of Commerce figures and industry estimates. Canadian companies aren't assigned a share since the calculation is based on the U.S. market.
|
Rank |
Company |
Top
Executive |
Stores |
Sales
in $ Billions |
|
|
1 |
Wal-Mart
Supercenters |
Doug
Degn |
1243 |
95.0
(est.) |
|
Note: Groceries at Wal-Mart Supercenters account for approximately 30% of total sales, or $31 billion. Supercenter sales represent nearly 40% of total corporate sales, which are estimated at $243.6 billion for 2002.
|
2 |
Kroger
Co. |
Joseph
A. Pichler |
3685 |
52.1
(est.) |
Note: Kroger store totals include 2,461 supermarkets, 783 convenience stores and 441 fine jewelry stores.
|
3 |
Costco
Wholesale Corp. |
Jim
Sinegal |
299 |
38.0
(actual) |
Note: Groceries, encompassing food and sundries, account for approximately 60% of Costco's total sales, or $22.8 billion.
|
4 |
Albertsons |
Larry
Johnston |
2290 |
35.7
(est.) |
Note: Albertsons store totals include 1,346 supermarkets, 741 freestanding drug stores and 203 fuel centers.
|
5 |
Safeway |
Steve
Burd |
1793 |
35.0
(est.) |
|
6 |
Sam's
Club |
Kevin
Turner |
522 |
31.7
(est.) |
Note: Groceries, encompassing food and sundries, account for approximately 62% of Sam's total sales, or $19.7 billion. Sam's Clubs account for approximately 13% of Wal-Mart sales, estimated at $243.6 billion for 2002. Sam's also operates 69 units overseas.
|
7 |
Ahold
USA Retail |
Bill
Grize |
1633 |
25.1
(est.) |
Note: Ahold USA Retail accounts for approximately 59% of Ahold USA sales, estimated to be $42.6 billion for 2002; the balance of U.S. sales -- an estimated $17.5 billion -- comes from Ahold USA Foodservice. Ahold USA accounts for approximately 57% of the parent company's 2002 estimated sales of $74.3 billion.
|
8 |
Supervalu |
Jeff
Noddle |
1391 |
19.5
(est.) |
Note: Sales from 613 corporate stores and sales to 778 licensed Save-A-Lot stores combine to account for approximately 50% of total sales. Corporate stores encompass 268 supermarkets, 262 Save-A-Lot limited assortment stores and 83 Deal$ general merchandise stores.
|
9 |
Publix
Super Markets |
Howard
Jenkins |
739 |
15.8
(est.) |
|
10 |
Fleming |
Mark
S. Hansen |
17 |
15.5
(est.) |
Note: Fleming is a major supplier of Super Kmart and Super Target stores, and volume from those companies is reflected in the sales totals for Fleming and for each retailer individually. Fleming's sales total excludes volume from 110 retail stores, which the company is attempting to sell; however, it plans to retain 17 Yes! Less limited assortment stores.
|
11 |
Delhaize
America |
Pierre-Olivier
Beckers |
1485 |
15.1
(est.) |
Note: Delhaize America, the U.S. division of Brussells-based Delhaize Group, encompasses 1,228 Food Lion stores, 138 Kash 'n Karry units and 119 Hannaford Bros. stores. Delhaize America accounts for approximately 70% of Delhaize Group's sales, which are estimated at $21.9 billion (U.S.) for 2002.
|
12 |
Loblaw
Cos. |
Galen
Weston |
1027 |
14.8
(est.) ($U.S.) |
Note: Loblaw operates 626 corporate stores that account for approximately 75% of total sales and supplies 400 franchised stores that account for approximately 25% of sales.
|
13 |
Winn-Dixie
Stores |
A.
Dano Davis |
1073 |
12.2
(est.) |
|
14 |
Meijer |
Doug
Meijer and Hank Meijer |
156 |
10.9
(est.) |
|
15 |
A&P |
Christian
Haub |
692 |
10.8
(est.) |
Note: Volume total encompasses sales from 626 corporate stores in the U.S. and sales to 66 franchised units in Canada. Sales in Canada account for approximately 23% of the company's total sales.
|
16 |
7-Eleven |
Jim
Keyes |
5805 |
10.1
(est.) |
Note: Volume includes $2.8 billion from gasoline sales. 7-Eleven operates 5,306 stores in the U.S. and 499 in Canada. All stores in Canada and 48% of those in the U.S. are corporate-owned; 52% of the stores in the U.S. are franchised. U.S. sales account for 90% of the company's total sales.
|
17 |
H.E.
Butt Grocery Co. |
Charles
C. Butt |
304 |
9.8
(est.) |
Note: H-E-B sales include volume from 20 stores in Mexico.
|
18 |
C&S
Wholesale Grocers |
Rick
Cohen |
0 |
9.7
(est.) |
Note: C&S supplies products to a variety of Top 75 retailers, and volume from those companies is reflected in the sales totals for C&S and for each of the individual retailers. C&S volume does not include sales from GU Markets, an affiliate of C&S that operates 26 former Grand Union locations.
|
19 |
Sobeys |
Bill
McEwan |
1323 |
6.7
(est.) ($U.S.) |
Note: Sobeys operates 392 corporate stores (including 206 supermarkets, 123 convenience stores and 63 drug stores) that account for approximately 25% of total sales and supplies 931 franchised stores that account for approximately 75% of sales.
|
20 |
Wakefern
Food Corp. |
Thomas
Infusino |
48 |
6.2
(est.) |
Note: Wakefern supplies products to two other Top 75 companies -- Village Super Markets and Inserra Supermarkets -- and volume from those companies is reflected in the sales totals for Wakefern and for each of the individual retailers. Wakefern declined to indicate what percent of total sales are done by corporate stores.
|
21 |
BJ's
Wholesale Club |
Michael
T. Wedge |
140 |
5.8
(est.) |
Note: Groceries, encompassing food and sundries, account for approximately $4.1 billion, or 70% of BJ's total sales.
|
22 |
Super
Target |
Robert
J. Ulrich |
94 |
4.5
(est.) |
Note: Super Target sales represent approximately 10% of Target Corp.'s total sales, which are estimated at $43 billion for 2002.
|
23 |
Shaw's
Supermarkets |
Paul
Gannon |
185 |
4.5
(est.) |
Note: Shaw's is a division of Sainsbury plc, London.
|
24 |
Giant
Eagle |
David
Shapira |
213 |
4.4
(est.) |
Note: Volume total encompasses sales from 124 corporate stores and sales to 89 franchised independent stores.
|
25 |
Hy-Vee
Food Stores |
Ron
Pearson |
216 |
4.2
(actual) |
Note: Hy-Vee operates 188 supermarkets and 28 drug stores.
|
26 |
Pathmark
Stores |
Eileen
Scott |
144 |
4.0
(est.) |
|
27 |
Nash
Finch Co. |
Ron
Marshall |
112 |
4.0
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at Nash Finch account for 25% of total sales.
|
28 |
Super
Kmart |
James
Adamson |
117 |
3.8
(est.) |
Note: Food sales at Super Kmart, encompassing groceries, consumables and restaurants, account for approximately 32% of total Super Kmart sales, or $1.4 billion. Super Kmart volume represents approximately 12% of the company's total sales, which are estimated at $31.5 billion for 2002.
|
29 |
Roundy's |
Robert
A. Mariano |
64 |
3.7
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at Roundy's account for 43% of total sales.
|
30 |
Spartan
Stores |
James
B. Meyer |
115 |
3.4
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores, encompassing 94 supermarkets and 21 deep-discount drug stores, account for 40% of total sales.
|
31 |
Metro |
Pierre
Lessard |
543 |
3.3
(actual) ($U.S.) |
Note: Metro operates 140 corporate stores that account for approximately 33% of sales and supplies 403 franchised stores that account for approximately 67% of sales.
|
32 |
Aldi |
Charles
Youngstrom |
625 |
3.2
(est.) |
|
33 |
Raley's
Supermarkets |
William
Coyne |
134 |
3.2
(est.) |
|
34 |
Associated
Wholesale Grocers |
Gary
A. Phillips |
74 |
3.1
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at AWG account for 15.5% of sales.
|
35 |
Wegmans
Food Markets |
Danny
Wegman |
64 |
3.0
(est.) |
|
36 |
Unified
Western Grocers |
Al
Plamann |
5 |
2.8
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at UWG account for 2.5% of sales. It announced plans early in the year to sell the five corporate stores, as well as seven others that were closed in 2001.
|
37 |
Stater
Bros. Markets |
Jack
Brown |
156 |
2.7
(actual) |
|
38 |
Whole
Foods Market |
John
Mackey |
135 |
2.7
(actual) |
|
39 |
Harris
Teeter |
Fred
Morganthall |
143 |
2.4
(actual) |
Note: Harris Teeter is a division of Ruddick Corp., Charlotte, N.C.
|
40 |
Penn
Traffic Co. |
Joseph
V. Fisher |
215 |
2.3
(est.) |
Note: Penn Traffic also serves as a wholesaler to 82 licensed units and 66 independent operators.
|
41 |
Schnuck
Markets |
Craig
Schnuck |
90 |
2.1
(est.) |
|
42 |
Weis
Markets |
Robert
F. Weis |
161 |
2.1
(est.) |
|
43 |
Price
Chopper |
Lewis
Golub |
102 |
2.1
(est.) |
|
44 |
Ingles
Markets |
Robert
P. Ingle |
199 |
2.0
(actual) |
|
45 |
Demoulas
Market Basket |
William
J. Shea |
58 |
1.9
(est.) |
|
46 |
Overwaitea
Food Group |
Steve
Vanderleest |
95 |
1.8
(est.) ($U.S.) |
|
47 |
WinCo
Foods |
William
D. Long |
38 |
1.8
(est.) |
|
48 |
Alex
Lee Inc. |
Boyd
George |
108 |
1.7
(actual) |
Note: Sales at Alex Lee Inc. include $1 billion from Lowes Food Stores, Winston-Salem, N.C., and $1.4 billion from Merchants Distributors, Hickory, N.C., a wholesaler (approximately 48% of whose sales go to Lowes). Volume total excludes $270 million in sales from Institution Food House, Hickory, a food-service distributor.
|
49 |
Purity
Wholesale Grocers |
Sal
Ricciardi |
0 |
1.7
(est.) |
|
50 |
Brookshire
Grocery Co. |
Bruce
Brookshire |
152 |
1.7
(est.) |
|
51 |
Bashas' |
Eddie
N. Basha Jr. |
133 |
1.6
(est.) |
|
52 |
Save
Mart Supermarkets |
Robert
M. Piccinini |
97 |
1.6
(est.) |
Note: Save Mart was anticipating a store count of 125 as it entered 2003, pending the close of its acquisition from Fleming of 26 Food 4 Less Stores, plus two under construction.
|
53 |
Smart
& Final |
Ross
Roeder |
240 |
1.6
(est.) |
Note: Smart & Final operates 195 warehouse stores and 45 cash-and-carry stores. Volume total excludes food-service sales of approximately $380 million, or 19% of the company's total volume.
|
54 |
White
Rose Foods |
Stephen
Bokser and Richard Neff |
0 |
1.5
(est.) |
|
55 |
Grocers
Supply Co. |
Max
Levit and Milton Levit |
0 |
1.5
(est.) |
|
56 |
Marsh
Supermarkets |
Donald
W. Marsh |
281 |
1.5
(est.) |
Note: Marsh store totals include 112 supermarkets and 169 convenience stores.
|
57 |
Fiesta
Mart |
Louis
Katipodis |
50 |
1.5
(est.) |
|
58 |
Associated
Food Stores |
Richard
Parkinson |
24 |
1.3
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at Associated account for 28% of sales.
|
59 |
Big
Y Markets |
Donald
D'Amour |
49 |
1.2
(est.) |
|
60 |
Associated
Wholesalers Inc. |
J.
Chris Michael |
10 |
1.1
(est.) |
Note: Corporate stores at AWI account for 7% of total sales.
|
61 |
K-VA-T
Food Stores |
Jack
Smith |
86 |
1.0
(est.) |
|
62 |
Foodarama |
Joseph
Saker |
22 |
0.96
(est.) |
|
63 |
Minyard
Food Stores |
Gretchen
Minyard Williams and Liz Minyard |
74 |
0.93
(est.) |
|
64 |
Federated
Cooperatives |
Dennis
Banda |
11 |
0.93
(actual) ($U.S.) |
Note: Corporate stores at Federated account for 3.5% of sales. Food sales at Federated account for 44% of total sales, or $2.1 billion (U.S.).
|
65 |
Inserra
Supermarkets |
Lawrence
R. Inserra |
21 |
0.90
(est.) |
|
66 |
Village
Super Market |
James
Sumas |
23 |
0.90
(est.) |
|
67 |
Bozzuto's |
Michael
Bozzuto |
10 |
0.90
(actual) |
Note: Corporate stores at Bozzuto's account for 3% of total sales.
|
68 |
Wild
Oats Markets |
Perry
Odak |
99 |
0.90
(est.) |
|
69 |
Associated
Grocers |
Robert
Hermanns |
1 |
0.90
(actual) |
|
70 |
United
Supermarkets |
Gantt
Bumstead |
44 |
0.80
(est.) |
|
71 |
Brookshire
Brothers |
Tim
Hale |
72 |
0.77
(est.) |
|
72 |
King
Kullen Grocery Co. |
John
B. Cullum and Bernard D. Kennedy |
48 |
0.77
(est.) |
|
73 |
Haggen
Inc. |
Dale
C. Henley |
29 |
0.76
(est.) |
|
74 |
Eagle
Food Centers |
Robert
Kelly |
63 |
0.69
(est.) |
|
75 |
Redner's
Markets |
Richard
Redner |
45 |
0.68
(est.) |
Note: Redner's store totals include 34 supermarkets and 11 convenience stores.
![]()
SUPERMARKET NEWS GLOBAL TOP 25 |
Following is a chart of the largest global food retailers. Sales figures are for the latest financial year unless otherwise stated. Companies included on the list must have a significant portion of their sales in food. The foreign currency results were translated into dollars at current exchange rates. The information came from company documents unless otherwise stated.
|
Rank |
Company |
Top
Executive |
Stores |
Sales |
Countries
of Operation |
|
1 |
Wal-Mart
Stores |
H.
Lee Scott |
4,190 |
$195.27
billion (53 weeks) |
United
States, Canada, Mexico, United Kingdom, |
|
2 |
Carrefour |
Daniel
Bernard |
8,926 |
$55.3
billion (64.791 billion Euros) |
France,
Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Switzerland, Spain, Greece, Portugal,
Turkey, Italy, Poland, Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, Chile,
Singapore, Indonesia, Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia, China, Thailand, South
Korea |
|
3 |
Kroger
Co. |
Joseph
A. Pichler |
2,354 |
$49
billion |
United
States |
|
4 |
Ahold |
Cees
van der Hoeven |
8,062 |
$44.8
billion |
United
States, The Netherlands, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Latvia, Lithuania,
Estonia, Portugal, Spain, Czech Republic, Poland, Brazil, Argentina,
Chile, |
|
5 |
Metro |
Jan
von Haeften |
2,169 |
$40.09
billion (46.93 billion Euro) |
Germany,
Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, United
Kingdom, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Morocco, The Netherlands,
Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey |
|
6 |
Albertson’s |
Peter
Lynch |
2,533 |
$36.8
billion |
United
States |
|
7 |
Tesco |
Terry
Leahy |
907 |
$32.38
billion (22.8 billion pounds) |
United
Kingdom, Ireland, Hungary, Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Thailand,
South Korea, Taiwan |
|
8 |
Safeway |
Steven
A. Burd |
1,688 |
$31.98
billion |
United
States, Canada |
|
9 |
Rewe
Zentrale |
Hans
Reischl |
11,788 |
$31.88
billion (73.65 billion Deutschmarks) |
Germany,
Austria, Italy, France, Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia,
Croatia, Romania, Ukraine, Bulgaria |
|
10 |
Aldi |
Theo
Albrecht |
4,388 |
$26.48
billion (31 billion Euro; M+M Eurodata estimate) |
Germany,
France, United States, United Kingdom, Ireland, Belgium, Australia,
Austria, Luxembourg, Denmark, The Netherlands |
|
11 |
Edeka/AVA |
Hermann
J. Ruetz |
12,000 |
$26.45
billion (61.1 billion deutschmarks) |
Germany,
Denmark, Austria, Czech Republic, Poland, France |
|
12 |
ITM
Enterprises |
Pierre
Gourgeon |
8,545 |
$26.14
billion (30.6 billion Euro, M+M Eurodata estimate) |
France,
Spain, Portugal, Italy, Belgium, Germany, Poland, Canada |
|
13 |
J.
Sainsbury |
Sir
Peter Davis |
626 |
$26.13
billion (18.4 billion pounds) |
United
Kingdom, United States |
|
14 |
Ito-Yokado |
Toshifumi
Suzuki |
35,600 |
$25.85
billion (3.1 trillion yen) |
Japan,
Taiwan, United States, Thailand, Mexico, Australia, South Korea, Canada,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, China, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Spain,
Puerto Rico, Guam, Turkey |
|
15 |
Groupe
Casino |
Christian
Couvreux |
6,650 |
$24.94
billion (29.2 billion Euros) |
France,
Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Uruguay, Argentina, Poland, Thailand, Taiwan |
|
16 |
Daiei |
Isao
Nakaouchi |
7,800 |
$23.74
billion |
Japan,
China, United States |
|
17 |
Supervalu |
Mike
Wright |
1,194 |
$23.2
billion |
United
States |
|
18 |
Tengelmann |
Karl-Erivan
W. Haub |
6,689 |
$23.12
billion |
Germany,
Austria, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Poland, Hungary, Italy, Spain,
Portugal, Denmark, Switzerland, United States, Canada, China |
|
19 |
Jusco |
Toshiji
Tokiwa |
1,780 |
$21.02
billion (2.525 trillion yen; |
Japan
|
|
20 |
Auchan |
Christophe
Dubrulle |
243 |
$20.13
billion (154 billion French francs) |
United
States, Mexico, Argentina, Luxembourg, France, Spain, Portugal, Morocco,
Poland, Hungary, Italy, China, Taiwan |
|
21 |
E.
Leclerc |
Michel
and Edouard Leclerc |
555 |
$17.94
billion (21 billion Euro; M+M Eurodata estimate) |
France,
Spain, Portugal, Poland, Slovenia |
|
22 |
Delhaize
“Le Lion” Group |
Pierre-Olivier
Beckers |
2,310 |
$15.55
billion |
United
States, Belgium, Luxembourg, Greece, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania,
Thailand, Indonesia, Singapore |
|
23 |
Fleming
Cos. |
Mark
Hansen |
250 |
$14.44
billion |
United
States |
|
24 |
Winn-Dixie
Stores |
Allen
R. Rowland |
1,079 |
$13.7
billion |
United
States, Bahamas |
|
25 |
Loblaw
Cos. |
John
A. Lederer |
606 |
$13
billion |
Canada
|
![]()
SUPERMARKET FACTS - INDUSTRY OVERVIEW 2002
|
Number of employees- 2002 |
3.4 million |
|
Number of grocery stores-2002 |
166,135 |
|
Total grocery store sales-2002 |
$535.4 billion |
|
Total supermarket sales-2002 |
$411.8 billion |
|
Number of supermarkets--2002 ($2 million or more in annual sales) |
32,981 |
|
Net profit after taxes, 2001/2002 |
1.36% |
|
Typical supermarket size-2001 |
44,000 sq. ft. |
|
Average Number of Items (SKUs) Carried in a Typical Supermarket-2001 |
30,580 |
|
Labor as a % of operating expense-2000 |
*53.1% |
|
Average effective income tax rate (fed, state, local) 2001/2002 |
35% |
|
Percentage
of disposable income spent on food--USDA figure for 2001 |
|
|
Weekly sales per supermarket<-2002/TD> |
$361,564 |
|
Weekly sales per square foot of selling area-2002 |
$11.13 |
|
Sales per customer transaction-2001 |
$25.66 |
|
Sales per labor hour-2001 |
$130.00 |
|
Average # of trips per week consumers make to the supermarket-2002 |
2.2 |
Sources:
U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Progressive Grocer magazine, U.S. Census Bureau, and Food Marketing
Institute
|
Store Definitions |
By Type of Store
Grocery
Store — Any retail store selling a line of dry grocery, canned
goods or nonfood items plus some perishable items.
Supermarket—Any
full-line self-service grocery store generating a sales volume of $2 million or
more annually
Convenience Store— Any full-line, self-service grocery store
offering limited line of high-convenience items. Open long hours and provides
easy access. The majority sell gasoline with an annual sales of $2 million or
more.
Independent — An operator of fewer than 11 retail stores.
Chain — An operator of 11 or more retail stores.
By Store Format
Conventional
Supermarket - The original supermarket format offering a full line of
groceries, meat, and produce with at least $2 million in annual sales.
Conventional stores will realize 9% of their sales in GM/HBC. These stores
typically carry approximately 15,000 items, offer a service deli and frequently
a service bakery.
Superstore - A larger version of the conventional supermarket with at
least 40,000 square feet in total selling area and 25,000 items. Superstores
offer an expanded selection of non-foods (at least 10% GM/HBC).
Food/Drug Combo - A combination of superstore and drug store under a
single roof, with common checkouts. GM/HBC represents at least one-third of the
selling area and approximately 15% of store sales. These stores also have a
pharmacy.
Warehouse Store - A low-margin grocery store offering reduced
variety, lower service levels, minimal decor, and a streamlined merchandising
presentation, along with aggressive pricing. Generally, warehouse stores don't
offer specialty departments, e.g., Xtra.
Super Warehouse - A high-volume, hybrid format of a superstore and a
warehouse store. Super warehouse stores typically offer a full range of service
departments, quality perishables, and reduced prices, e.g., Cub Foods.
Limited-Assortment Store - A "bare-bones," low-priced
grocery store that provides very limited services and carries fewer than 2,000
items with limited-if any-perishables, e.g., Aldi and Sav-A-Lot.
Other - The small corner grocery store that carries a limited
selection of staples and other convenience goods. These stores generate
approximately $1 million in business annually.
Convenience Store (Traditional) - A small, higher-margin store that
offers an edited selection of staple groceries, non-foods, and other convenience
food items, i.e., ready-to-heat and ready-to-eat foods. The traditional format
includes those stores that started out as strictly convenience stores but might
also sell gasoline.
Convenience Store (Petroleum-Based) - The petroleum-based stores are
primarily gas stations with a convenience store.
Non-Traditional Grocery
Hypermarket
- A very large food and general merchandise store with approximately 180,000
square feet of selling space. While these stores typically devote as much as 75%
of the selling area to general merchandise, the food-to-general merchandise
sales ratio is typically 60/40, e.g., Bigg's.
Wholesale Club - A membership retail/wholesale hybrid with a varied
selection and limited variety of products presented in a warehouse-type
environment. These 120,000 square-foot stores have 60% to 70% GM/HBC and a
grocery line dedicated to large sizes and bulk sales. Memberships include both
business accounts and consumer groups, e.g., Sam's Club, Costco, and BJ's.
Mini-Club - A scaled-down version of the wholesale club. The
mini-club is approximately one-fourth the size of a typical wholesale club and
carries about 60% of the SKUs, including all of the major food and sundry
departments and a limited line of merchandise (soft goods, office supplies, and
opportunistic, one-time buys), e.g., Smart & Final. Some of these stores do
not have membership fees and often operate as a "cash & carry."
Supercenters - A large food/drug combination store and mass
merchandiser under a single roof. The supercenters offer a wide variety of food,
as well as non-food merchandise. These stores average more than 170,000 square
feet and typically devote as much as 40% of the space to grocery items, e.g.,
Wal-Mart, Kmart, Super Target, Meijer, and Fred Meyer.
Deep-Discount Drug Store - A low-margin, GM/HBC store with
approximately 28,000 square feet of selling space and 25,000 SKUs. These stores
typically carry fewer sizes but more GM/HBC brands than a supermarket. Food
accounts for 20% of store sales, e.g., Phar-Mor and Drug Emporium.
Internet - An
Internet-based grocery distribution operator. Included in this format are all
Internet operators who use the Internet as the primary means of accepting
grocery orders for home delivery or pickup. Also included are major food
retailers that generate a portion of their sales through Internet-based sales.
Internet suppliers typically offer 12,000 SKUs or more for home delivery, e.g.
Peapod.
Sources: Progressive Grocer's 2002
Marketing Guidebook and Bishop Consulting, 2002 .
Food Retailers' Net Profit – Percent Of Sales
|
Grocery Store Chains Net
Profit – Percent Of Sales |
|||||
|
All
Firms |
|||||